|
How about the opposite: prove with a percentage of the number of total attacks how many of those were mass human wave attacks.
There are many U.S. references to non-human wave style attacks, but for some reason you have to call bullshit every time one of those is offered to you, despite the fact that people who outrank you many times were seriously concerned about them. Still, you seem to be preoccupied with the image of the U.S. soldier being up against an enemy who could only storm towards him, and not against one who was better at non detectable movement, nighttime fighting, one on one tactical decision making and the use of underground to enhance his defenses. That exactly why the current approach to be better than them fails: pride without thinking. Several U.S. Marine Generals agree with that assessment, and they express that publicly, but you are somehow smarter or better informed than any of them, right Rick?
|
|
So you're going to prove that the banzai attack was used a lot with a single or even a few references? New 
BoaterTalk 
