Clear all "New" markers Turn on extra data

Thread View Frames View Board View

Forum: LiquidLounge
Re: If the media had vetted Obama from the beginning the way they should have, and had they given Clinton the love they've GRITS New
Re: <No Subject> Oci-One.Kanubi New
Re: Very long, read at your own risk... GRITS New
Date: May 12 2008, 0:31 GMT
From: Oci-One.Kanubi

	Given: There is a near tie in popular vote Given: Two states muddied the waters by opting out of the system Given: Only the Clinton campaign shouts that she has a better chance against McCain in the general election Given: Only the Clinton campaign shouts that a Big State primary loss equals a Big State general election loss (or v.v.) Given: Obama has a nearly insurmountable lead in pledged delegates. Given: Many of the superdelegates will be reluctant to undermine the pledged delegates I just cannot understand why Russert keeps saying she has an equal chance of winning. Maybe he's the one engaging in the biased reporting you are worried about? I'll go with the other hundred forty-leven pundits, not with Russert. And if the superdelegates in the smoke-filled room nominate her, I'll know that nothing has changed, and that nothing ever will.  And I will be sad. That's all. -R, HKT

Add Message

Last I checked, Obama had like a 10% lead in pledge delegates, with many more delegates undecided. GRITS New

But it isn't neck-and-neck.  No how, no way.  Consider: Oci-One.Kanubi New

He has a lead of 171 pledged delegates with 217 pledged delegates to go. otto New

Dang numbers.  I thought numbers weren't ever s'posed to change? Oci-One.Kanubi New

Add Message