UserID:
Password:
Register
Help
FAQ
Full Search
My Page
Updates
Forums
BoaterTalk
Bugs and Suggestions
Liquid Lounge
Lost and Found
Planner
RaftZone
SurfZone
What's SUP
Sale!
GearSwap
Gauges
Videos
Articles
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Product Guide
Polls
Users
From past cases, I say the case is a slam dunk for the Catholics
Forum:
Liquid Lounge
[DELETE]
Catholics take it up a notch...
rlhartman
New
lrcable
Whether you agree with them or not, the first amendment kind of gives them a big boost on this one.
Add Reply
View
Thread
Board
Stacked Frame
Side Frame
Sort
Topic
Reply
What a messed up country we live, where your employer decides what medical care is accessible to you
20yrboater
New
Don't work for the Catholic Church then.
lrcable
New
Great, I'm a Jehova Witness, we don't believe in blood being drawn so I won't pay for blood tests or transfusions
<NT>
Helly
New
Well, that is correct, since you wouldn't have it done.
<NT>
lrcable
New
So then it's ok for a Jehova Witness owned company not to have to pay for blood or blood tests?
<NT>
Helly
New
I think it would be fine for people under the Hall's insurance to not cover transfusion.
lrcable
New
one difference
DangerJudy
New
You think abortion never saves a life?
janedoe
New
Not that you care, but...
DangerJudy
New
There are actually a number of alternatives to blood transfusions
lrcable
New
Great, live to your belief system, but don't expect me to.
Helly
New
So you advocate eliminating job opportunities? Health care, clean water and clean air aren't optional in democracies.
20yrboater
New
Health coverage from one's employer mostly started after WW2, a relatively recent phenomenon...
rlhartman
New
Sad that the right wing wants to keep employment and health care locked together. Free the private sector.
<NT>
20yrboater
New
Seems the left wing does too.
RandyH
New
The GOP and the lobbyists were the only ones opposed to Goverment and universal health care in '90s
<NT>
20yrboater
New
I TOTALLY agree that employment and health care should NOT be tied together. However...
rlhartman
New
please name one type of "other insurances"
rustyboater
New
You'll die without food and shelter, but I don't see you advocating that employers must provide those...
rlhartman
New
wrong.
rustyboater
New
Until you stop with the personal "Rovian" garbage it's impossible to have a reasoned discussion with you...
rlhartman
New
hahahahahaha!
rustyboater
New
And as an aside: You must have a man-crush on Karl Rove. You mention him almost every day. Have you told him?
<NT>
rlhartman
New
show me
rustyboater
New
there is one hole in that argument: Shared risk...................
Terrell
New
Agreed, but everyone misses the ROOT CAUSE of this problem...
rlhartman
New
Last time I looked we were a constitutional republic.
lrcable
New
2 points:
2
peterelkon
New
you beat me to the punch...
1
rustyboater
New
How would taking less healthcare cost more?
lrcable
New
Of course they are reaching
DangerJudy
New
Because of the consequences of taking less care of your health.
peterelkon
New
No, you are still reaching. No contraceptives does not equate to no healthcare
1
lrcable
New
Larry gets it. He worded it very well.
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Then the church should not be allowed to provide healthcare. Simple.
<NT>
SirFlipsALot
New
Huge fines if they do not.
DangerJudy
New
and
DangerJudy
New
So I can start a hospital and not treat STDs because I think its sinful?
<NT>
SirFlipsALot
New
Yes why not?
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Hah!
riverlarken
New
Is he trying to be?
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
he wasn't the one I was referring to
<NT>
riverlarken
New
Its a free country
DangerJudy
New
referring to the constitution is reaching?
rustyboater
New
Just what constitutional amendment guarentees that your employer buys you birth control?
lrcable
New
nice leap there Larry
rustyboater
New
Again, what individual right is being violated by the Catholics not providing birth control?
lrcable
New
no one said that either
rustyboater
New
Imagine
DangerJudy
New
one more time
1
rustyboater
New
"It appears to you as an outsider"
DangerJudy
New
of course they won't
riverlarken
New
Kill em all, let baal sort em out
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
i understand completely
rustyboater
New
You just illustrated by your post
DangerJudy
New
evidently I should have added...
rustyboater
New
Nope
DangerJudy
New
how many hospitals are where you live?
rustyboater
New
Is that ONE hospital a Catholic Hospital?
Teledave
New
no...Methodist...
rustyboater
New
Thanks for the answer.
Teledave
New
Very well said
<NT>
rlhartman
New
i've got no blood in this...
rustyboater
New
There! "If the law did not cover..." The problem in a nutshell!
rlhartman
New
You poor thing
DangerJudy
New
oops, mandate not mandade
DangerJudy
New
And there have ALWAYS been exemptions for certain types of employers and organizations
1
lrcable
New
those exemptions
rustyboater
New
I don't think it's legal for businesses to discriminately hire on the basis of religious affiliation
DangerJudy
New
You do understand that you can buy either full or supplemental coverage on your own?
RandyH
New
Dumb logic. I'm a cancer survivor and had a corrected heart condition. Wanna sell me some insurance?
<NT>
Helly
New
Sure. Wanna pay what I would charge for it?
RandyH
New
And that's just the point.
peterelkon
New
Sorry, you're dead wrong. There are many people who "can't" buy insurance at any cost.
<NT>
1
Helly
New
Are you trying to tell me that if you offered to pay $1M for a health insurance policy...
RandyH
New
Is that a realistic argument? If I could afford a million dollar policy I wouldn't need insurance, would I?
<NT>
Helly
New
It is about as realistic as asking for somebody to give you a policy for less than what it costs them.
<NT>
RandyH
New
Free contraceptives easy to find no insurance required
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
I can find you a free car too, just not the same value as one that works the way it should.
<NT>
dangore
New
Same meds, same condoms, same everything, free, easy to find
<NT>
-2
DangerJudy
New
Simply not true!....I know this for fact from family experience
<NT>
dangore
New
Do tell
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
If you cannot figure out that the different pills....
dangore
New
Talk with her I think you mean
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Ever heard of prexisting conditions? And major medical policies which are incomplete coverage?
20yrboater
New
I want Obamacare repealed, but not have our old health care system...
-1
RandyH
New
I think employers should be free to offer whatever benefits they wish, and you should be free to choose where to work...
rlhartman
New
nice vaccuum...
1
rustyboater
New
I am free to apply where I wish, and I'm free to quit anytime. Slavery was abolished a while back, y'know.
rlhartman
New
because everybody doesn't have the same choices
1
rustyboater
New
Nor does everyone require babysitting. Why do you insist that everyone be reduced to the least common denominator?
rlhartman
New
still clueless I see...
rustyboater
New
So are you in favor of choice, or not?!?
rlhartman
New
you're so far away from the original subject this is meaningless
3
rustyboater
New
Correct. Its the same kind of thinking as the Court declaring that corporations can anonymously fund voting ads
20yrboater
New
and everyone free to go without health coverage puts their cost burden on everyone else
<NT>
20yrboater
New
That's because gov't has corrupted the health care system by requiring treatment for those without coverage...
1
rlhartman
New
You know, the Dutch have accomplished that rather nicely, and pretty close to universally.
peterelkon
New
Your description sounds promising. I'm interested.
rlhartman
New
It's dumb that GOP wants to keep employment and health care tied together.Separate them, like other developed countries
<NT>
20yrboater
New
I TOTALLY agree that employment and health care should NOT be tied together. However...
1
rlhartman
New
A Government health care program (w coverage for all at small cost) would allow this. Wish we had it.
<NT>
1
20yrboater
New
No, simply replacing the role of the employer with gov't is no improvement.
rlhartman
New
Government health care coverage would eliminate the profit thereby reducing costs significantly
20yrboater
New
I'm no lawyer but I think the church will lose big in court of public opinion
1
SwimmerBill
New
Is this the first time you've noticed that the Catholic Church is extremely socially conservative?
lrcable
New
Change that to the hierarchy of the Catholic Church.
1
otto
New
Gates of hell shall not prevail
DangerJudy
New
Well, it does in Alabama.
peterelkon
New
Oh no!
DangerJudy
New
Is freedom of religion an individual or group right?
SwimmerBill
New
Yes
DangerJudy
New
Yawn.
otto
New
Making personal attacks never wins debates
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Sadly it is the laying out of facts that fails to win debates.
<NT>
otto
New
All you have to do is make one factual comment about the Catholic church....
1
dangore
New
Maybe we should look at that coexist sticker some more
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Yes the Catholic church should....so far they have failed to grasp it.
<NT>
dangore
New
You're the one on here spewing vitriol.
DangerJudy
New
You have not heard vitriol.....
dangore
New
It sure reads like it to me
DangerJudy
New
I would hope you would read very angry at religions that stand in the way of humanity....
dangore
New
Yes you are angry. I am sorry.
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
love love
riverlarken
New
Line them up against the wall
DangerJudy
New
maybe we should.
peterelkon
New
Good luck with that.
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Eh, there's always prayer.
<NT>
peterelkon
New
We're arguing about whether churches should be treated "special"...
rlhartman
New
It does have to be different....
dangore
New
Since when is free contraception = health care?
DangerJudy
New
Since when does it not?
<NT>
dangore
New
It's never been defined that way before.
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
It's alway been defined that way.....
dangore
New
Like all institutions throughout history, including gov'ts and churches...
1
rlhartman
New
You are getting angry
DangerJudy
New
Once again you ignore all the health benefits of the different forms of contraception.
dangore
New
and you ignore the health detriments
DangerJudy
New
Speaking for me personally, I don't see it that way...
1
rlhartman
New
you are certainly free to not offer health insurance but not to forbid others to offer it
SwimmerBill
New
You're correct, but if we believe that the gov't can mandate employer healthcare coverage...
1
rlhartman
New
As I read it you are calling for fewer players and choices?
SwimmerBill
New
You assert: Birth control = Abortion?
SwimmerBill
New
No.
DangerJudy
New
Court will not advocate for a discriminatory policy by an employer
<NT>
20yrboater
New
here's a scenario...
rustyboater
New
I think it would depend on if they operated it as a for profit or a non-profit organization.
lrcable
New
that has nothing to do with it...
rustyboater
New
Yes they are going to take over the world
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Yes they are going to take over the world
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
that already happened...
rustyboater
New
"When religion ruled the earth, it was called the Dark Ages"
<NT>
rlhartman
New
And we are still fighting off the dark ages as eveidence by this on-going thread!
<NT>
dangore
New
I wholeheartedly agree! But that doesn't necessarily mean we should throw the baby out with the bathwater.
rlhartman
New
Yes church plans to buy auto makers
1
DangerJudy
New
good sarcastic response to a totally moronic scenario
<NT>
peterj
New
you should know
<NT>
rustyboater
New
Only if they come up with a completely new legal argument
zahadum
New
We shall see.
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Not saying they can't win.
zahadum
New
We shall see.
<NT>
DangerJudy
New
Login
Register
Forums
BoaterTalk
Bugs and Suggestions
Liquid Lounge
Lost and Found
Planner
RaftZone
SurfZone
What's SUP