UserID:
Password:
Register
Help
FAQ
Full Search
My Page
Updates
Forums
BoaterTalk
Bugs and Suggestions
Liquid Lounge
Lost and Found
Planner
RaftZone
SurfZone
What's SUP
Sale!
GearSwap
Gauges
Videos
Articles
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Product Guide
Polls
Users
Right. The developers would have to file a case and pay for expenses.
Forum:
Liquid Lounge
[DELETE]
Good news: "Court Sides With Property Owners Over EPA"
rlhartman
New
[DELETE]
based on the narrowly defined limits of the decision I would support that
peterj
New
[DELETE]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this mean the EPA has to win in court before the property owner has to fix damage?
otto
New
[DELETE]
yes, but if the regulation was fairly enforced, why would the EPA lose?
peterj
New
SirFlipsALot
I support the right to appeal an EPA decision, but most likely the EPA was justified in halting construction. More details are needed really.
Add Reply
View
Thread
Board
Stacked Frame
Side Frame
Sort
Topic
Reply
Halting construction is one thing...
RandyH
New
What if there were major damage to the watershed occuring during the appeals process?
<NT>
SirFlipsALot
New
That is why the construction can and should be halted pending the appeal.
RandyH
New
From what I read the couple had already filled the drainage with rocks and dirt.
SirFlipsALot
New
Login
Register
Forums
BoaterTalk
Bugs and Suggestions
Liquid Lounge
Lost and Found
Planner
RaftZone
SurfZone
What's SUP
