Clear all "New" markers Turn on extra data

Thread View Frames View Board View

Forum: BoaterTalk
Re: I think that, for their own safety, trout fishermen should be banned from the headwaters whenever flow is over 400 cfs. ezwater New
Re: I think boaters should just get over it and be happy that they can paddle  other sections of the river TheBroncoKid New
Re: You live where you don't have to care. Your opinion is near useless. Without weight. <NT> ezwater New
Re: River wise your right who care what a butt boater thinks, political  thinkin  is mostly correct. Louie New
Date: Jul 22 2008, 20:46 GMT
From: TheBroncoKid

	that right there would be way more effective than anything AW has done screw submitting letters, just have a huge ass protest paddle

Add Message

The problem is not what AW has done.  The problem is the way the USFS has responded.  They are offering almost nothing. ezwater New

How in the hell have we ended up in a pissin contest with fishermen? We have more in comman with them than almost any Louie New

Louie, it's like some parties regard the Headwaters as their private clubhouse, and don't want certain minorities in. ezwater New

You mean Tiger Wood ain' t a member of some country club? <NT> Louie New

I quit dippin Copenhagen years ago, but i can start again for a good cause. <NT> backbonz New

Think whatever you want to think, but ask yourselk who it is that's working on the behalf of the boating community TheBroncoKid New

Damn keep that kinda talk up and you might have to start paddlin a canoe. <NT> Louie New

Wait a minute, Mr. Incoherent. USFS has done a good job on other rivers, so it's not like they suddenly dropped the ball ezwater New

So you're blaming the USFS because AW was unable to represent paddlers as well as TU represented their fisherman? TheBroncoKid New

The quote you have of me is not incoherent. You were incoherent. The USFS made the decision, and it was not supposed to ezwater New

It was indeed incoherent as well as irrelevant. Anyway ...... TheBroncoKid New

Add Message