Userid: Password:
BoaterTalk
BoaterTalk
NRS
BoaterTalk: The International Information Site for the Whitewater Paddler

Forum
Forum: BoaterTalk

Clear all "New" markers Turn on extra data

Thread View Frames View Board View

idea I think that, for their own safety, trout fishermen should be banned from the headwaters whenever flow is over 400 cfs. New

Forum: BoaterTalk
Date: Jul 22 2008, 19:28 GMT
From: ezwater

ezwater
It gets to be unsafe for wading, and fishing from the banks causes way too much erosion and siltation.

Add Message

note At what point does it become boatable and what is today level? Ya ain't stirrin up shit are ya. <NT> Louie New
smile Hey Louie...you didn't get the memo ditchbitch New
note Can you guys just not let it go? <NT> donutboy New
note Iam askin a legit question to someone who has first hand knowlege of the river. So you tell me what is min on the river? <NT> Louie New
more I'm sorry were you just referin to me and Cummie or did you mean to include EZ also ? EZ how about that you included Louie New
note I've been in every inch of that streambed, and I'm saying, 400 cfs is max for safety of wading fishermen. <NT> ezwater New
note Memo, the Mexican guy that works at the resturant? Must be, cause I know you don't take this shit serious. <NT> Louie New
note ditch, the guy is new to the board. Give him some time to build up his tolerance and understanding. <NT> ezwater New
smile you mean like this? ditchbitch New
idea Best gage at Burrells Ford, AW site has good level recommendations <NT> ga_creeker New
smile I think boaters should just get over it and be happy that they can paddle  other sections of the river TheBroncoKid New
note You live where you don't have to care. Your opinion is near useless. Without weight. <NT> ezwater New
note River wise your right who care what a butt boater thinks, political  thinkin  is mostly correct. Louie New
note They way I see it is that when it rains, boaters should treat it as opening day and flock to it TheBroncoKid New
note The problem is not what AW has done.  The problem is the way the USFS has responded.  They are offering almost nothing. ezwater New
note How in the hell have we ended up in a pissin contest with fishermen? We have more in comman with them than almost any Louie New
note Louie, it's like some parties regard the Headwaters as their private clubhouse, and don't want certain minorities in. ezwater New
note You mean Tiger Wood ain' t a member of some country club? <NT> Louie New
note I quit dippin Copenhagen years ago, but i can start again for a good cause. <NT> backbonz New
note Think whatever you want to think, but ask yourselk who it is that's working on the behalf of the boating community TheBroncoKid New
note Damn keep that kinda talk up and you might have to start paddlin a canoe. <NT> Louie New
note Wait a minute, Mr. Incoherent. USFS has done a good job on other rivers, so it's not like they suddenly dropped the ball ezwater New
doh So you're blaming the USFS because AW was unable to represent paddlers as well as TU represented their fisherman? TheBroncoKid New
note The quote you have of me is not incoherent. You were incoherent. The USFS made the decision, and it was not supposed to ezwater New
note It was indeed incoherent as well as irrelevant. Anyway ...... TheBroncoKid New
note Son rivers are like women, you can't do them all, but you should try to. <NT> Louie New
smile then go do her and don't worry bout her troutfish'n boyfriend coming after you TheBroncoKid New
NRS

Add Message