Agree and Disagree (timeline and correct action)
SummitAP
While you make some interesting points, the validity largely rests on answers we do not have from Snodgrass (questions I asked in the "Devil is in the Details - Questions for Ryan" post)

Just to clarify the timeline (ranges given because times are not precise):

0 - Raft dumps swims
5-15 min - Girl self rescues, emergency personnel are called
30-45 min - emergency rescue and Ryan Snodgrass on opposite bank in verbal-visual contact with patient (who is first is still under debate)
45-60 min - Ryan swims across the river and walks to the patient
60-75 min - Emergency personnel cross the river and walk to the patient
75-90 min - Emergency personnel return patient to the roadside.

And to reiterate some points:

She couldn't be walked back to the bridge according to Ryan's original post.

SINCE RESOURCES FOR A DRY TRANSPORT WERE AVAILABLE:
If she was critically injured, putting her back in the water is not appropriate care as it would worsen hypothermia and exacerbate trauma.
If she was not-critically injured, putting her back in the water is not necessary because you have time and alternatives. Getting her wet would certainly more stress.
Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Digg Delicious Linkedin
Add Reply    
ICF World Championships